Mafia Day Thread: Round 3

[Daz]

ROLE LIST
2 Mafioso = A member of the mafia who decides who to kill each night. They take it in turns to visit the player they are targeting to kill. Ruling note- if the mafia kill fails they will be informed that it failed, but not why it failed, meaning they do not know if it was due to night immunity or the player being healed by the doctor.
1 Consort = A member of the mafia who decides to roleblock one person each night, preventing that player's night action from being carried out if the player has one. Becomes a mafioso if all the mafiosos are dead. Ruling notes- Roleblocking works on the detective, tracker and doctor, but not the medium, because the medium's night action occurs before everyone else's resolves. If the roleblocked player has a night action that can be roleblocked then they will informed that they were roleblocked; if the player has no night action/cannot be roleblocked then they will not be informed since the roleblock wouldn't have done anything.
1 Doctor = An innocent who may heal a player to prevent them from being killed once every night. They may heal themselves twice. Ruling note- neither the doctor or the healed player will be told if the healed player was targeted by the mafia.
1 Detective = An innocent who may learn the faction (innocent, mafia, or neutral) of one player every night.
1 Medium = An innocent who may speak with all dead players during the night phase. They are immune from being killed for the first two night phases only. Ruling note- They will speak to dead players in a chat separate to the dead chat, so that dead players may continue to talk during the day phase.
1 Tracker = An innocent who may visit another player's house at night and see who visited that player. The roles in this game who can visit other people (excluding the tracker) are the mafioso, doctor, detective, vigilante and consort.
1 Vigilante = An innocent who may kill another player at night. This ability may be used one time only. If the vigilante kills an innocent player (as opposed to a neutral or mafia player) then the following night they will commit suicide and also die.
1 Executioner = A neutral whose win condition is to get a target town member lynched- their target will be randomly generated. The executioner is immune from being killed at night. If their target is killed at night, the executioner becomes a jester.
1 Jester = A neutral whose win condition is to be lynched. The jester is immune from being killed at night. If the jester succeeds at getting lynched they have the ability to kill one of the people who voted against them the previous day - this ability must be used.
4 Normal Town Members = An innocent without any special abilities.

Other useful info can be put here upon request!

 

[Rae]

Well, that's never how I play this game. >.> Regardless of my role or lack thereof. Especially since it looked like trip would be lynched with or without my vote. Like I said, I was planning on voting for trip the next time I got online, but @Luster had already voted for him again by the time I did. At that point, my vote wasn't needed. So why risk it?

 

[An Otaku]

Hello... Doctor.

So like. If you did heal me last night, you know, I'd ah... appreciate maybe a check-up?

I doubt we're going to get anywhere this Day Phase. After another one dies, we'll have lost our lead. As great as trip's demise was, with no follow up death, it will still be squandered because we've gotten nowhere. So, just in case, feel free to heal me again... I'm scared.

 

[Matizze]

@Luster , I think you let your emotions get the best of you. In fact, you've had it out for me ever since I voted on you for the lolz the very first day. Either that, or you are exe and I am your target.
This is actually a pretty plausible theory, seeing as you have shared suspicions on other people from time to time, but always together with me, as if you are trying to cover up me being the actual target.

@An Otaku , I am sorry to say, but I feel it to be highly improbable that the doctor is still alive, seeing as no one counter-claimed Trip...
There is an ever so slim chance though, that the doctor voted for Trip and decided not to reveal themself as it seemed as if Trip would be lynched either way. Risky, but possible.

 

[An Otaku]

@Luster , I think you let your emotions get the best of you. In fact, you've had it out for me ever since I voted on you for the lolz the very first day. Either that, or you are exe and I am your target.
This is actually a pretty plausible theory, seeing as you have shared suspicions on other people from time to time, but always together with me, as if you are trying to cover up me being the actual target.

@An Otaku , I am sorry to say, but I feel it to be highly improbable that the doctor is still alive, seeing as no one counter-claimed Trip...
There is an ever so slim chance though, that the doctor voted for Trip and decided not to reveal themself as it seemed as if Trip would be lynched either way. Risky, but possible.

Youve got that backwards friend. The actual doctor wouldn't have come out unless Trip stood a good chance of fooling people. Seeing as we lynched him, the doctor probably didn't feel the need to reveal. Correctly.

The chances of Maf hitting neutral last round... no. I am positive they hit doc's target.

Anyway, @Luster , I'll trust you. If you vote Kimberlyn or Matizze, maybe even another, I'll second you.

 

[Lusterine]

@Luster , I think you let your emotions get the best of you. In fact, you've had it out for me ever since I voted on you for the lolz the very first day. Either that, or you are exe and I am your target.

Interestingly enough, I forgot that you voted for me. Thinking on that now, why would you vote for me, but not trip? You didn't want to lynch the doctor, but now think the doctor is dead. You called the chances of the detective being dead improbable. It's pretty much the same chances for both.

In fact, you advocated for the detective to reveal themselves and check trip, knowing full well we'd need another night cycle (with potential of townie death). Then, they'd be revealed and it'd be fairly easy for townie to win once they've roleblocked the doctor.

I'm not executioner, and I'm fully convinced you're not a townie.

I'll vote @Matizze. @Daz

 

[Matizze]

Interestingly enough, I forgot that you voted for me. Thinking on that now, why would you vote for me, but not trip? You didn't want to lynch the doctor, but now think the doctor is dead. You called the chances of the detective being dead improbable. It's pretty much the same chances for both.

In fact, you advocated for the detective to reveal themselves and check trip, knowing full well we'd need another night cycle (with potential of townie death). Then, they'd be revealed and it'd be fairly easy for townie to win once they've roleblocked the doctor.

Well, for one, you didn't exactly claim to be doc when I voted for you. Secondly, I was fully prepared to withdraw my vote on any given time, had it become a serious lynching attempt in which you had proved to be a townie. I did, however, as so many others, try looking like a jester by random lynching.
But most importantly: in the Trip case, my vote would have been the deciding factor between a lynch or not. I just wasn't prepared to make that decision.

I actually had a plan, if you had bothered to hear me out on my suggestion, and that involved the detective only outing themself if Trip did in fact prove to be the doctor. Then, Trip, as confirmed doctor, would be able to protect the detective, and the tracker could watch Trip. This would ensure a better safety for said roles as a) the detective would be protected and b) in the case of the doctor being targeted by a role block, the tracker would have found one of the mafia.

I'll admit that it would have been a gamble though, just as my idea of working together with the exe would have been. But I like taking risks, and ultimately I guess that's why you feel that I am suspicious.
None of this will, however be necessary any longer so I suggest we instead try to come up with a new tactic.

We could still try to cooperate with the neutral roles, but it is starting to seem unlikely that these would out themselves on their own.
Our tracker will probably prove to be useless until we catch the escort, too. This leaves us in a tricky situation...

I'm not executioner

I would say that if you aren't exe, Luster, then you are mafia. In other words: @Daz , I vote for @Luster .

 

[An Otaku]

@Daz
I vote @Matizze

 

[Daz]

Interestingly enough, I forgot that you voted for me. Thinking on that now, why would you vote for me, but not trip? You didn't want to lynch the doctor, but now think the doctor is dead. You called the chances of the detective being dead improbable. It's pretty much the same chances for both.

In fact, you advocated for the detective to reveal themselves and check trip, knowing full well we'd need another night cycle (with potential of townie death). Then, they'd be revealed and it'd be fairly easy for townie to win once they've roleblocked the doctor.

I'm not executioner, and I'm fully convinced you're not a townie.

I'll vote @Matizze. @Daz

Well, for one, you didn't exactly claim to be doc when I voted for you. Secondly, I was fully prepared to withdraw my vote on any given time, had it become a serious lynching attempt in which you had proved to be a townie. I did, however, as so many others, try looking like a jester by random lynching.
But most importantly: in the Trip case, my vote would have been the deciding factor between a lynch or not. I just wasn't prepared to make that decision.

I actually had a plan, if you had bothered to hear me out on my suggestion, and that involved the detective only outing themself if Trip did in fact prove to be the doctor. Then, Trip, as confirmed doctor, would be able to protect the detective, and the tracker could watch Trip. This would ensure a better safety for said roles as a) the detective would be protected and b) in the case of the doctor being targeted by a role block, the tracker would have found one of the mafia.

I'll admit that it would have been a gamble though, just as my idea of working together with the exe would have been. But I like taking risks, and ultimately I guess that's why you feel that I am suspicious.
None of this will, however be necessary any longer so I suggest we instead try to come up with a new tactic.

We could still try to cooperate with the neutral roles, but it is starting to seem unlikely that these would out themselves on their own.
Our tracker will probably prove to be useless until we catch the escort, too. This leaves us in a tricky situation...


I would say that if you aren't exe, Luster, then you are mafia. In other words: @Daz , I vote for @Luster .

@Daz
I vote @Matizze

That's two votes against Matizze, one against Luster.

 

[Pf.D]

I kind of ditto the suspicions around @Matizze if for the simple fact it it's painstakingly unclear as to whose side you're on based on your posts. And sure that can be said for many of us but I think it's most prevalent in your case. This doesn't mean I think you're maf, you could totally be a neutral, I dunno.

Also, if y'all don't mind me being a little wild with my speculations, @Joan is a bit sus to me on account of being too nice. Like it seems that they're inclined to stick up for everyone regardless of their own personal suspicions and while that's all well and good it could also be some sort of tactic to get us to trust them and to deflect any negative suspicions that might have arisen.

That's all I've got, and I know these are both kind of baseless, but it is what I think. On that note, I'll vote @Matizze

@Daz

 

[An Otaku]

I kind of ditto the suspicions around @Matizze if for the simple fact it it's painstakingly unclear as to whose side your own based on your posts. And sure that can be said for many of us but I think it's most prevalent in your case. This doesn't mean I think you're maf, you could totally be a neutral, I dunno.

Also, if y'all don't mind me being a little wild with my speculations, @Joan is a bit sus to me on account of being too nice. Like it seems that they're inclined to stick up for everyone regardless of their own personal suspicions and while that's all well and good it could also be some sort of tactic to get us to trust them and to deflect any negative suspicions that might have arisen.

That's all I've got, and I know these are both kind of baseless, but it is what I think. On that note, I'll vote @Matizze

@Daz

Haha... so like. I know I've sorta said that I myself can't rely on others' knowledge of a suspect in terms of what's suspicious or not, but I mean...
(￣▽￣*)ゞ
That's just who Joan is?

By all means, keep making your own readings. I think that's a good idea. But, just to throw this out there, Joan is usually friendly and nice like that, so... you know. ┐(￣ヘ￣;)┌

 

[Rae]

Haha... so like. I know I've sorta said that I myself can't rely on others' knowledge of a suspect in terms of what's suspicious or not, but I mean...
(￣▽￣*)ゞ
That's just who Joan is?

By all means, keep making your own readings. I think that's a good idea. But, just to throw this out there, Joan is usually friendly and nice like that, so... you know. ┐(￣ヘ￣;)┌

I can attest to this. Nothing about Joan's behavior has been inherently suspicious, and I know her quite well.

That being said, she's a damn excellent spy (another type of deception game), so she could have us all fooled. >.>

 

[Joan]

I can attest to this. Nothing about Joan's behavior has been inherently suspicious, and I know her quite well.

That being said, she's a damn excellent spy (another type of deception game), so she could have us all fooled. >.>

...Yeah, I'm pretty good at Spyfall. XD that was a fun round heh

Okay, in all seriousness, though...

Also, if y'all don't mind me being a little wild with my speculations, @Joan is a bit sus to me on account of being too nice. Like it seems that they're inclined to stick up for everyone regardless of their own personal suspicions and while that's all well and good it could also be some sort of tactic to get us to trust them and to deflect any negative suspicions that might have arisen.

Mostly what I've been trying to do is provide more information. I'm firmly of the belief that if I have information that could help somebody draw better conclusions with their logic, I should give it. You need as much information as you can get if you're going to draw a sound logical conclusion, and that's something that's very important to me.

All that being said, I still have no diddly darn clue who to vote, and I've been unwell the past two days and my period just started today, so I don't trust myself to exactly be smart about everything right now. >.>

 

[Lusterine]

@Kimberlyn no words on @Matizze?

 

[Kiilgore]

I remember that matizze called suspicions on dipper for him asking for doc counterclaims. Yet uses 'nobody counterclaimed' as a reason to not vote trip.

In addition, that whole too reliant on practically all the powerroles (that very well might be dead mind you.) feels off to me. Too... passive.

I would say that if you aren't exe, Luster, then you are mafia. In other words: @Daz , I vote for @Luster .

This feels like an OMGUS vote...

!VOTELYNCH @Matizze @Daz

 

[Matizze]

@Kimberlyn no words on @Matizze?

I'm a devilishly handsome fella, obviously, she is awestruck. *poses sexily*

I remember that matizze called suspicions on dipper for him asking for doc counterclaims. Yet uses 'nobody counterclaimed' as a reason to not vote trip.

Hey, that's true! I don't even remember why I did that... I think it had something to do with the rest of you dismissing my plans and ideas, which made Dipper feel extra suspicious... but it could just have been an attempt to rile Dipper up and try to get more information out of them... I honestly don't recall

In addition, that whole too reliant on practically all the powerroles (that very well might be dead mind you.) feels off to me. Too... passive.

Or maybe I know more about the power roles than I've let on ;)
Nah, but it's more about the statistics and that the risk of power roles being dead are slim this early in the game.

Hey, @Daz, how many more votes untill I'm dead?

 

[Rae]

@Kimberlyn no words on @Matizze?

I'm sorry. I'm gonna have to back out of this one. Partially cause I don't have a hard decision but mostly because I haven't slept in 30 hours, and I have to stay awake for another 7 more at least.

So, my brain is absolutely fried. Autocorrect is my only savior from incoherency at the moment. >.<

Seriously, I will be back either tomorrow or Friday. >.> preparing for college is stressful

 

[Daz]

Vote Tally

Matizze:
Luster
Otaku
Pf.D
Kiilgore
Total = 4

Luster:
Matizze
Total = 1

Hey, @Daz, how many more votes untill I'm dead?

A total of 6 votes is needed, so 2 more.

NOTICE: This voting phase may be extended another day without notice. I'm getting my A-level results tomorrow, and so I may not want to come onto Iwaku depending on my reaction to my results.

 

[Dipper]

Alright, well, based on what I've read, and since I don't have anything of my own, I'll give my vote to Matizze.

 

[IceQueen]

I vote for Matzzie as well

 

[An Otaku]

Mildly concerned how easily the vote went through for Matizze. I won't pull back my vote or anything, but... well. I think this is just how things went in Game 2. Them's the breaks, I suppose.

But ah... if you feel like visiting me, doc...