K
Kestrel
Guest
I'm referring to the kind of jokes like Gwazi's, not rallying for a right to ram video presentations down rape victims' throats. Besides, I'm sure you're well aware of how these situations work; evoking a situation associated with a traumatic experience is not just done by mentioning a word (especially when written instead of spoken) but more by recreating part of a feeling or experience. Word associations are far weaker than say, associations with smell or loud noises. To actually trigger with words you need to go quite a bit beyond "Remove it at once or you're raping me."Forcing exposure on others who may be traumatized can very much have the opposite effect though Kestrel. To say that it is all on the audience is to whitewash and clear the speaker of all consequence of his own actions and behavior. That is not to say you don't have a point. There is a reason a lot of social commentary is done trough satire and humor. And why so many really good comedians have some serius inner demons.
The second part (or first, 'cause chronology) is that censorship eliminates possibilities for open discussion. The social commentary is indeed done through satire and humour for a reason. There are pro's and con's as to everything, but in the long term I think it's obvious where I stand. I'm very scared of a society that wants to control spoken word and expression. It removes the hatred we see, but makes it breed more strongly in people's hearts.
I also think we need to establish a clear line between triggering trauma and feeling uncomfortable or angry, but it might not be the best time or place to discuss that. This is off-topic enough as it is ;p