- Invitation Status
- Posting Speed
- 1-3 posts per week
- One post per week
- Slow As Molasses
- Writing Levels
- Give-No-Fucks
- Intermediate
- Adept
- Advanced
- Prestige
- Douche
- Adaptable
- Preferred Character Gender
- No Preferences
I added that 'monsters' bit because I'm quite tired of people that want absolutely deplorable characters (especially when they're supernatural) to be defrosted by a saccharine smol innocent human girl, as an example. I get it a lot since I play darker characters, antagonists, or those aligned on the chaotic and 'evil' (not necessarily chaotic evil) lines. The Defrosting Ice King/Queen/Monarch trope is great and all, but I'm sick to death of seeing it all the time, hence why I put that there.I'm interested in both the faustian contract and mixing of mythologies concepts though I'm a bit confused and curious about the 'monsters' original concept and what you mean by that. owo
My monsters are not beholden to random characters that people make in an attempt to romance them; they will care about who they care about and damn the rest. (And/or they're conflicted or have inner issues that take precedence over romance, for the most part.) My monsters, ideally, act like actual monsters; the idea of someone innocent and the personification of purity and 'good' trying to tame them (or even if they're not that, just the whole 'taming' deal) is a joke.
I also put that bit there because it's the same attitude I have toward certain canons I play, like Sebastian and Alucard. Romancing them will take a lot of grueling work and I'm picky about whom I play them opposite and what characters I'll accept, if I accept romance for those types at all. If they're willingly putting themselves into romance and I'm at the helm (and I take great pains to avoid breaking canon), it's more likely to be because the 'romance' serves a purpose for them. It's a means to an end.
I also personally don't like the pressure of having to conform to romantic expectations OOC, so I avoid them like a plague if possible.
I wanted to be forward with my answer, so I'm sorry if I seem aggressive.
Anyway! If you'd like, you can PM me/I can PM you.
edit: to clarify, my "monsters" do come in many flavors. That point was geared more toward the more malignant of "monsters" and those who come along hoping to write opposite them as a form of wish fulfillment with a character created for the express purpose of seducing them, which then turns into a shitshow lol
I've gotten it a lot over the years, so I'm wary of the whole "dominant supernatural/monster x submissive human" deal that has still, after all these years, not lost any popularity
Last edited: