I think the only alteration from last time was I switched from Judging to Prospecting.
Probably because I ended up having huge eye openers lately where no one person is fully correct, and that we need a combination of many view points to make it as a society.
Another thing I'd like to ask everyone:
In your own opinion/perspective, does the personality type you get from the test fit yourself?
I feel it's mostly accurate.
I'm iffy about being Intuitive instead of Observant.
Mainly because I feel enough of a disconnect with most people (especially family) I often find myself more observing their behaviours as an outsider than I do anything else.
And reading the descriptions I would call myself more Observant still because I tend to work with actual proven examples.
However I do also aim to be rather open-minded, and I am naturally curious about a lot of topics which might be where Intuitive came from.
That and I do generally tend to push for an idealistic world and outcome, I just recognize one needs to use factual and structured means in order to get there.
Because no amount of going "I want this to happen! So let's make it happen because emotion!" is going to work, you need to actually think that shit through.
To word it another way, in the colour quiz of Blue, Green, Orange and Yellow I ranked high in Blue and Green.
Green being logical and critical, Blue being feeling and emotional. My primary was Blue, but minimally so, Green was almost dead-on tied with it.
So I figured it was because I tend to set rather moral and ideal based goals and objectives, but I let the path of logic and reason guide me towards getting there.
Which amusingly often makes me clash with people quite a bit.
The more critical people because we have clashing goals.
The more emotional people because we have clashing means of getting there.