H
Hellis
Guest
Original poster
OH GOD MY MONEY
Stop. I LIKE MY MONEY
*sniffles* FIne, I'll pawn my kidneys.
DC: Hi, Marvel!
DC: Hi, Marvel!
You do realize that's not Tony, Right? ;p
Natasha Stark
I guess one can make believe it's Tony. ;p
EDIT: I know the Story is 'gender bent'. But it's still not Tony in my book.
For the record, your OP post wasn't clear on the content expected. Since this is intent, I would have never posted. Because obviously, I don't follow everything from Marvel or DC, so I have no idea if those are fan made vids, or the real thing. So I am very sorry, all of my post are a complete derailment.It is not here, nor there. We will not adress it again, This thread is about hype for incoming shit. Most likely marvel shit.
Well, they are supposed to be a tie in to the movie verse and the movie verse is introducing magic. ( It also is in the loosest sense, the main introduction to inhumans/ prequel to the inhumans movie.)Ghost Rider in Agents of Shield sounds like a really peculiar choice o.o I'd have thought he'd have fared a lot better with a Netflix series (alongside Moon Knight and Blade).
SHIELD kind of has its dark moments throughout the series's course, they killed a main character recently to end the last arch, trust me season 1 does not gauge the level of crazy the show does.I meant on a tonal level. Ghost Rider is a pretty dark and gritty character, and so would have been more suitable alongside the Netflix series which have been pretty dark and tonally adult too. Admittedly I haven't been keeping up with A.O.S since Season 1 but it just feels like a really odd choice.
Eh... :/
He even looks like Dr. Strange, all we need is Loki to meet up with him and all the fangirls and boys will lose their minds.@Hellis
You forgot something.
Eh... :/
This looks like it will be the same problem Batman VS Superman had but worse.
Throwing in a bunch of characters in one movie instead of taking time to develop each of them with their own.
All in an attempt to catch up with the MCU which took YEARS to build up properly.
Counterpoint: Guardians of the Galaxy.@Hellis
You forgot something.
Eh... :/
This looks like it will be the same problem Batman VS Superman had but worse.
Throwing in a bunch of characters in one movie instead of taking time to develop each of them with their own.
All in an attempt to catch up with the MCU which took YEARS to build up properly.
Maybe. But I'm one of those outlier Marvel Fans whose react to Guardians of the Galaxy was "Meh, it was good. But not as great as others make it out to be".Counterpoint: Guardians of the Galaxy.
One movie pretty much solidly outlined exactly who each of the main cast were, fleshed out their personalities and motivations, and gave them all adequate screen time without feeling like it was forced or bloated. Avengers could have happened just fine without the lead-up films, although there'd probably have to be a slight bit more explaining here and there to iron out exactly why the characters were all there.
You could theoretically speaking. But that then puts reliance on comics or show watching, and if you're a more Casual Movie goer (like myself) you may know the names and faces of heroes like Aquaman and Flash, but you won't know them enough to get that good an understanding or feel for them.Considering that most of the characters in Justice League are really well known by now, do we really need an origin movie for each of them? Granted, it's cool to see how a character got started from time to time, but I'm pretty sure someone who grew up in an isolated native tribe deep in the Amazon jungle could tell you Batman or Spider-Man's origin story by now.
Not denying those are also problems.Batman v. Superman's big problem other than being too dark and self-serious for its own good was that it tried to fit too much plot content in an already stretched out run time. They seriously had enough content for 5-6 movies that they crammed into one.