- Invitation Status
- Looking for partners
- Posting Speed
- One post per day
- 1-3 posts per week
- One post per week
- Writing Levels
- Intermediate
- Adept
- Advanced
- Preferred Character Gender
- No Preferences
- Genres
- Urban Fantasy, High Fantasy, Epic Quest, Sci-Fi, Time Travel and World Hopping, Steampunk, Action/Adventure, Modern Drama, Mystery, Slice of Life, Romance, and many more.
Another discussion feeling out what people prefer in the content forum's resources!
Please let us know how you feel on the following subjects in regard to resource threads in the Insitute and Guild
Length: (Do you like long articles, short articles, medium ones, and are there any extra caveats to your length preference such as being padded with fluff, jokes, and/or personal stories, or re-hashing a point that you understood fine ten paragraphs ago, or glossing over/omitting details that seem important)
Off-Links: (do you resent being flung around Iwaku or the internet by embedded links, or do you find them a helpful resource? Do you feel disappointed when an article spends a bigger chunk of time pointing at other articles than it does making its own original points, or is it a good tie-in/info hub?)
Tone: (Do you like a casual, conversational tone in an article? Do you like it when the writer addresses the reader (ie: "you are probably wondering why this is an issue") Is it okay to stray into personal anecdotes? Or do you like it to be more to-the-point, professional, or serious? How do you feel about rants?)
References: (How do you feel when an article references published material such as TV shows, videogames, webcomics, or any other fandom type medium to make examples, points, or comparisons? Is the article often completely lost on you when you don't know the thing being referenced? Or do you extrapolate from context and muddle through with minimal issue? Do you wish more articles would make their point without relying on these references? Or are they a nice add-in for those who get them?)
Other: (Any other elements of articles you'd like to state your preference on?)
Please let us know how you feel on the following subjects in regard to resource threads in the Insitute and Guild
Length: (Do you like long articles, short articles, medium ones, and are there any extra caveats to your length preference such as being padded with fluff, jokes, and/or personal stories, or re-hashing a point that you understood fine ten paragraphs ago, or glossing over/omitting details that seem important)
Off-Links: (do you resent being flung around Iwaku or the internet by embedded links, or do you find them a helpful resource? Do you feel disappointed when an article spends a bigger chunk of time pointing at other articles than it does making its own original points, or is it a good tie-in/info hub?)
Tone: (Do you like a casual, conversational tone in an article? Do you like it when the writer addresses the reader (ie: "you are probably wondering why this is an issue") Is it okay to stray into personal anecdotes? Or do you like it to be more to-the-point, professional, or serious? How do you feel about rants?)
References: (How do you feel when an article references published material such as TV shows, videogames, webcomics, or any other fandom type medium to make examples, points, or comparisons? Is the article often completely lost on you when you don't know the thing being referenced? Or do you extrapolate from context and muddle through with minimal issue? Do you wish more articles would make their point without relying on these references? Or are they a nice add-in for those who get them?)
Other: (Any other elements of articles you'd like to state your preference on?)