- Invitation Status
- Posting Speed
- Speed of Light
- 1-3 posts per week
- One post per week
- Online Availability
- Saturdays and Sundays.
- Writing Levels
- Intermediate
- Adept
- Adaptable
- Preferred Character Gender
- Male
- Female
- Transgender
- Genres
- Romance. Modern. Dystopian. Horror.
That is actually a very fair point. Evil characters do not have to be portrayed as a'staticly' bad character. That is what I was going for, actually. I suppose my explanations were not clear at all and I should elaborate more on the "Good" and "Evil conflict. Same for a "good" Zodiac. A good Zodiac doesn't necessarily have to be a little angel throughout the RP. Motives and moral plays an important role in mostly everything; In the reality world and in the RP world, so I completely agree with you on this subject. I will try to elaborate more on this matter and edit a couple of posts. If I can find my error.I feel like "Good" and "Evil" are poor terms to describe the conflict here. I do not know how reasonable for all the "Evil" Zodiacs to be inherently cruel and malicious.
At least I do not think all the "Evil" characters have to be inherently bad. They can be characterized by having darker but believably sympathetic and even agreeable motives. Think of it as a case of "Ozymandias was right"
Also @Commander Cheesecake , do you really want us to fill out the entire CS? Or is it a reference? Because its needlessly detailed in my opinion. How my character will react to certain things for instance, can easily be radically different across different encounters of the same subject, based on the context of the independent situations.
No. You do not have to fill out the entire CS. That is actually just a reference. You may cut out things from that CS such as the "How does your character react.." part.