She was a good person but from what I get from your view is that she had to be a female bad-ass in order to satisfy your needs. Not everyone has to cut up a thousand soldiers in order to create peace. And to be honest, violence doesn't create peace, just more violence.
Nice Strawmanning. :P
I never argued peace, I never argued all females had to be bad-asses.
What I said was she was one of those "Moral because I want to be good" people, not "Moral because it will help my people".
For example, the second she was attacked on patrol her first reaction was to go back to the Capital (Target/Danger #1) because it was the 'right thing' to do, despite it doing nothing but put her in more danger (hell it what led to the situation that caused her to commit suicide).
Emmeryn obviously shown that she wasn't doing it for peace of mind, just by leaping off that cliff without hesitation alone.
There was hesitation there. She took a bit of time making the jump.
Plus you're looking at death as meaning the motivations must have been good.
Note: In this case I'm defining Good as "Morally good, with the intention of helping others", so if you're going to respond with a strawman of "Depressed people kill themself! Are you villifying them?" just don't, because once again that's not what I'm saying at all.
Not everything kills them self for good reasons, some do it because they realize their situation is screwed.
+Like past criticisms of her, she goes it because culturally her actions are morally 'good' even if logically there is no benefit to anyone.
Her people could've easily taken care of Gangrel, especially after getting help from whatever that place you go to early on in the game. Despite that, Emmeryn chose the road for peace and sacrificed herself for what she believed in.
Except they couldn't.
Immediately after she died Risen popped up and slaughtered most of them forcing a retreat.
Which considering she was there hostage for a time, probably had some clue or indication that was a thing Gangrel had up his sleeve.
And yes, I do realize in game her suicide did lead to peace.
But that's not how people work, even Gandhi's people eventually broke up into violence with one another.
The fact all her actions actually worked was because unrealistic writing, which is fine cause it's a fantasy.
But I'm still looking at a character for their actions and reasoning, and not the Mary Sue plot line the writers put her on.
And to make this 100% clear, I am not arguing she should of advocated and encouraged war. I agree that peace was the best outcome. But her methods didn't show "I want peace" it showed "I am a good person because this act counts as good? Right? What do you mean no one benefits? Culturally this a good action so it must be the proper way to respond".