I don't think it's a thing at all.
As I am speaking of appropriation, I am speaking of it in terms of the following definition: "the action of taking something for one's own use, typically without the owner's permission." This came from a google query "define:appropriation"
Then cultural appropriation can be seen as one culture taking something from another, typically without the culture's permission. I would extend this by also adding that it occurs typically without the culture appropriating understanding the origin or cultural background which resulted in the thing being appropriated.
The argument isn't that appropriation is inherently good or bad, but that it exists and can be bad; when it is bad, it is important to call it out.
I'm not arguing that. It definitely relates to the topic at hand.
I'm just saying that I personally don't really view it as being much of a thing.
But clearly others disagree, hence the whole reason discussions about this stuff happens in the first place. :)
I'd honestly wouldn't call something like that appropriation, but rather just a lack of information.
You get that problem in all kinds of things, people get false info, they jump on the first thing they hear, maybe they just grabbed something cool or convenient, they have bias towards/against certain sources or individuals etc.
You misunderstand; it is appropriation
precisely because of of a lack of information. The use of something without understanding or respecting its origins or meaning in its original form.
But instead of going "This is appropriating! Cut it out!" I think just taking the attempt to explain to them what's being shown wrong would be far more beneficial.
Does that always work? No, humans love to stay in biases. But that's also just something freedom of speech and expression comes with, people are going to spread false/ignorant stuff.
I think you're oversimplifying and misunderstanding; calling out appropriation is the attempt to explain that it's wrong. "What you're doing is appropriating something from this culture; the way you are using this, it's offensive and disrespectful. You're ignoring what this means."
While there may be people who simply toss out the term without following through, it seems unfair to categorize all uses of the term in the way you are now.
In the example of using native american imagery in sports logos and mascots, I will admit the issue doesn't only lie with appropriation, but also the perpetuation of racist stereotypes or slurs.
However, although a lie might be much faster to spread, the truth has the endurance to stand the test of time.
So I wouldn't get too worried about stuff like your example, in time people will smarten up and get more aware.
As long as there's individuals still out there trying to educate that is.
I suppose one doesn't have to get worried if one is a part of a dominant culture that only profits from appropriation.
The only way people "smarten up" is through people saying "Hey, this is cultural appropriation; don't do that, it's not okay." People don't spontaneously change minds and say "oh right, what we've been doing for so long is wrong!" It takes people taking action to make change.
I'm no expert, and I feel
@govangogh has a better grasp on it. A big factor in why it is seen as problematic and as needing to be addressed is enjoying the benefits of a culture without facing any of the drawbacks.