Mr. Ree took his cell phone out of his pocket as he strolled into the living room.(Love this post.)
Mr. Ree took his cell phone out of his pocket as he strolled into the living room. Robin Bank's text message made him roll his eyes involuntarily. "You are so adorable, " it read. Exasperated, he slid his phone back into his pocket. The memory of one drunken night with a far too clingy woman would haunt him forever. Glancing at the clock he was surprised to see just how late it was. Before rushing off to work he gave his face a good scrub. Winnie Bago was sure to be outside this time of day, so he had to look his best.
Mr. Ree had been in love with Winnie from the day she moved in next to him two years ago. The image of her sunning herself in that almost too small bikini was enough to bring him to his knees. "Winnie," he said as he walked oh so casually closer to the white picket fence that separated their yards. As luck would have it, Mr.Ree did not see the oddly placed rock in the middle of the yard, causing him to trip over himself. What a fool he was. There was no keeping your cool around Winnie Bago.
Mr. Ree took his cell phone out of his pocket as he strolled into the living room.Robin Bank's text message made him roll his eyes involuntarily."You are so adorable, " it read. Exasperated, he slid his phone back into his pocket. The memory of one drunken night with a far too clingy woman would haunt him forever. Glancing at the clock he was surprised to see just how late it was. Before rushing off to work he gave his face a good scrub. Winnie Bago was sure to be outside this time of day, so he had to look his best.
Who is Robin Banks though and how does he fit into the story at present?
I must say I strongly disagree with alot of your points. You should not chastice someone for flexing their intellectual muscle in writing.
'he wanted to look good for Winnie.' Is not a better worded segment then the alternative. One gives insight in what he had on him, gave a better description of his feeling and the circumstances. The other is a bland statement of facts. If feels your entire point is to rag on people for putting effort into being more elaborate and well worded. Explaining a scene to give a better mental image is not wrong. The fact that you treat any sort of none-barebone writing as a sin is really offputting.
There is a thing as going to in depth into something. But what you are doing is to treat anyone who writes in a different style of yours like they are worse writers then yourself and your entire premise is "I am the shit, you are not." Writing styles differ, and describing descriptive scenes as bullshit is disgenuine towards the entirety of the literate pursuit.
I'm sorry if you find this rude. But I have hard time seeing any of this helping players in any way. It feels more like imposing limitations because you don't like long posts.
I would honestly recommend people to pick up more books and compare styles and look at how they describe things rather then follow a post that says "Describing anything other then "he wants, he did" is wrong"
I agree with this 100%.In short; Equating your style as the only true way of doing thing is condencending and completely and utterly arrogant. I also note that you made the headline "Whats in a post" yet do not dissect or deconstruct a post as such. Instead you spend the entire post putting over why your style is better.
Also, OP, you sound incredibly shitty and pretentious by proclaiming this.Sure, you can have a very, very long post about how Mr. Ree is a great detective, how attractive/unattractive he is, and all this bullshit nobody cares about. If the post does not help the story along, or help you build your character, its crap.
I must say I strongly disagree with alot of your points. You should not chastice someone for flexing their intellectual muscle in writing.
'he wanted to look good for Winnie.' Is not a better worded segment then the alternative. One gives insight in what he had on him, gave a better description of his feeling and the circumstances. The other is a bland statement of facts. If feels your entire point is to rag on people for putting effort into being more elaborate and well worded. Explaining a scene to give a better mental image is not wrong. The fact that you treat any sort of none-barebone writing as a sin is really offputting.
There is a thing as going to in depth into something. But what you are doing is to treat anyone who writes in a different style of yours like they are worse writers then yourself and your entire premise is "I am the shit, you are not." Writing styles differ, and describing descriptive scenes as bullshit is disgenuine towards the entirety of the literate pursuit.
I'm sorry if you find this rude. But I have hard time seeing any of this helping players in any way. It feels more like imposing limitations because you don't like long posts.
I would honestly recommend people to pick up more books and compare styles and look at how they describe things rather then follow a post that says "Describing anything other then "he wants, he did" is wrong". You are not improving anyones writing from what I can see.
The 'this is shit' isn't actually meant as a put down. I have a weird sense of humour and do see how it could offend people. I have to apologize for how I worded it. I'll go back and reword it.In short; Equating your style as the only true way of doing things is condencending and completely and utterly arrogant. I also note that you made the headline "Whats in a post", yet do not dissect or deconstruct a post as such. Instead you spend the entire post putting over why your style is better.
I agree with this 100%.
Also, OP, you sound incredibly shitty and pretentious by proclaiming this.
Which isn't very Fonz-Cool.
While I admit my error, you really should learn how to argue. 'You sound shitty', that itself makes people start to ignore your posts because people feel attacked. Mistakes happen, and it would be different if I sat here behind my computer and argued that I did nothing wrong rather than admitting a mistake and trying to fix it. Your post isn't actually making a point rather than it is just obnoxious.