Due to a broken leg I've had a lot of free time on my hands. I've used this free time in any number of ways but mostly I've been delving deeper into the philosophy I hold near and dear to my heart. And that is anarchy, the desire to abolish the state. To rid the world of it blinders. Because lets face modern society is nothing but a joke. We are obessed by the Hollywood stars in all their shame and glory. We laugh at lol cats. We worry about the most trivial matters. Millions die from preventable causes and all we do is make sympathetic noises. Kids are lazy and overly sensitive cry babies. We complain about our leaders and yet we never step forward ourselves to show them their mistakes. This is why I believe the status quo has to go one way or the other. But that is the real question. Exactly what is the path any particular anarchist should take? Is showing people the light the way to go? Or is dragging people to the light the way to go? And if so how does the use of force separate one from the enemy as it were? For the state uses force to keep us in line. Whether through the law or in some cases a soldier's rifle. Is it merely because the end goal may be the 'right' choice that justifies any means an anarchist uses? And should the state be abolished what then?